AsterWell Operations
See the cost of time
Compare drilling duration, fuel use and estimated carbon under stated assumptions.
Explore the evidence
Select a precomputed synthetic case, inspect input assumptions and download its JSON evidence or result CSV.
Open AsterWell Operations explorer →What this edition demonstrates
Interval divided by penetration rate, with nonproductive time applied to total duration.
Illustrative planning arithmetic; no well-control or safety decisions.
The public website hosts a read-only synthetic projection. The full authenticated source application and its Git history are maintained privately.
All fixtures are fictional. No sign-in, customer records, operational writes or paid external model calls are involved.
Publication notices · Application metadataExplore the application directory
Governing Equations, Inputs, Outputs & Dimensional Conventions
AsterWell Operations executes deterministic client-side calculations in the browser. Every scenario is governed by explicit mathematical formulations and unit checks:
Declared Units & Arithmetic Conventions: Interval in metres (m); rate of penetration (ROP) in m/h; nonproductive time (NPT) in %; duration in hours (h) and days (d); fuel in litres (L); carbon emissions in metric tonnes CO2e (tCO2e); cost in assumed USD.
Scope & Operational Boundary: Drilling duration, fuel and carbon estimation using interval, penetration-rate and nonproductive-time assumptions. Not logistics dispatch, well control or operational safety guidance.
Launch Interactive AsterWell Operations Runtime → · Read Full Methodology & Validation Notes → · Download JSON Dataset (run/catalog.json)
Verified Case Study & Held-Out Reference Table
Worked Verification Case: Case 1 (800 m interval, ROP = 10 m/h, NPT = 10%, Daily Rate = 24,000 USD/d, Fixed Cost = 50,000 USD, Fuel Rate = 180 L/h, EF = 2.68 kgCO2e/L): Net drilling time = 80.0 h; with 10% NPT, T_total = 80 / 0.9 = 88.89 h (3.704 days). Total Fuel = 88.889 × 180 = 16,000 L; Emissions = 16,000 × 2.68 / 1,000 = 42.88 tCO2e; Estimated Cost = 50,000 + 3.7037 × 24,000 = 138,888.89 USD.
| Case | Interval (m) | ROP (m/h) | NPT (%) | Total Time (h) | Fuel (L) | Emissions (tCO2e) | Est. Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 (Baseline) | 800 | 10.0 | 10% | 88.89 | 16,000 | 42.88 | 138,888.89 |
| Case 2 (Hard Formation) | 1,200 | 8.0 | 15% | 176.47 | 31,765 | 85.13 | 226,470.59 |
| Case 3 (High Efficiency) | 800 | 12.5 | 5% | 67.37 | 12,126 | 32.50 | 117,368.42 |
Specialized Companion Applications on mkworks.co.business
To preserve topical focus and distinct search intent, mkworks.co.business hosts the following dedicated companion modules under canonical subpaths:
MinuteHarbor
Canonical Path: /minuteharbor/
Integer-cent allocation and reconciliation on fictional meeting records.
Boundary: Not a certified accounting system, legal compliance or live organizational records.
How to Use AsterWell Operations in 3 Reproducible Steps
- Select a Baseline Scenario or Practice Module: Open the interactive browser runtime and choose one of the shipped synthetic presets or diagnostic modules to load its verified input parameters and unit declarations.
- Inspect Intermediate Traces & Constraints: Review the computed ledger, error diagnostics (MAE/RMSE/margin/balance checks), or bilingual explanations alongside the governing equations documented on mkworks.co.business/methodology/.
- Export Portable Evidence (JSON / CSV): Export your scenario results, assumptions, or local study plan as a self-contained JSON or CSV file for offline verification and local re-import.
Methodological & Boundary FAQs
What mathematical model and units does AsterWell Operations use?
AsterWell Operations applies Drilling Time T_drill = Interval (m) / ROP (m/h); Total Duration T_total = T_drill / (1 − NPT_pct/100); Fuel (L) = T_total × Fuel_Rate (L/h); Emissions (tCO2e) = Fuel (L) × EF (kgCO2e/L) / 1,000; Cost = Fixed_Cost + (T_total / 24) × Daily_Rate. Units: Interval in metres (m); rate of penetration (ROP) in m/h; nonproductive time (NPT) in %; duration in hours (h) and days (d); fuel in litres (L); carbon emissions in metric tonnes CO2e (tCO2e); cost in assumed USD.
What are the operational boundaries and limitations of AsterWell Operations?
Drilling duration, fuel and carbon estimation using interval, penetration-rate and nonproductive-time assumptions. Not logistics dispatch, well control or operational safety guidance. All computations run deterministically in the browser on synthetic or precomputed demonstration fixtures.
How can I reproduce the benchmark results in AsterWell Operations?
Open the interactive browser workspace at ./run/, select Case 1 to inspect the worked result (Case 1 (800 m interval, ROP = 10 m/h, NPT = 10%, Daily Rate = 24,000 USD/d, Fixed Cost = 50,000 USD, Fuel Rate = 180 L/h, EF = 2.68 kgCO2e/L): Net drilling time = 80.0 h; with 10% NPT, T_total = 80 / 0.9 = 88.89 h (3.704 days). Total Fuel = 88.889 × 180 = 16,000 L; Emissions = 16,000 × 2.68 / 1,000 = 42.88 tCO2e; Estimated Cost = 50,000 + 3.7037 × 24,000 = 138,888.89 USD.), and export the JSON or CSV evidence ledger.
Engineering Attribution & Interconnected Research Hub
Authored and maintained by Mohammad Rezwan Khan, PhD (Aalborg University · BESS QA/QC & Power Systems Specialist). Canonical URL: https://mkworks.co.business/ · Source revision: verified-rel · Runtime SHA-256 prefix: verified-sha256 · Repository provenance: https://github.com/mohammadrezwankhan/asterwell-operations (private source engine; public deterministic browser projection).
Application Metadata (app.json) · AI / LLM Discovery Guide (llms.txt) · Full Technical Corpus (llms-full.txt) · Semantic Knowledge Graph (knowledge-graph.jsonld)
Explore the MKLab & ASTRA Research Ecosystem
- Mohammad Rezwan Khan, PhD — Core Authority & BESS QA/QC Hub
- Datacenter Twin Lab — 12-Lesson Power Systems & EMT Simulator
- HelioForge Energy Lab — Hybrid Solar-Wind-BESS Microgrid Dispatch
- ZephyrTrade — Wind-Market Quantitative Backtesting
- MKLab Directory — Complete 68-App Browser Engineering Suite
- Threadmark — Discounted Energy Cost Studio
- Quayline — Marine Supply Pricing Workspace
- HelioForge Energy Lab — Microgrid Simulation